Case Studies

Super Regional Bank: Cost-focused Operations Improvement and Lean Transformation Delivers 10x ROI

Super-Regional Bank
Location:
Eastern United States
Operating cost
20%
Annual savings
$53M
Capacity improvement
20%
Revenue productivity
15%
Break even point
5 mos.
ROI (12 month)
10x

CLIENT Situation:

Control Retail Banking Costs and Improve Efficiency

The bank suffered from its own success. Years of improving marketing and product development swelled volumes in the branches and contact centers. But operations execs had failed to improve productivity faster than revenue growth. Now, the board demanded cost cutting measures to increase profitability.

Customer service lagged. Sales execs had also failed to improve operational efficiency. But for now, the fact that each producer sold less was forgiven by overall revenue gains. Competitors noticed. They launched copycat products. And these competitors’ automation and process improvement capabilities gave them an operational efficiency advantage. The bank’s hard-won competitive advantage was at risk from its mediocre operations.

Project Sponsor

Vice Chairman

Self-funding transformation:

  • No new core technology
  • Enterprise-wide operations
  • 7-month implementation

Client Description, Project Scope, Objectives

This super-regional bank maintains a Top 3 competitor status in its eastern U.S. markets. With more than 1,000 branches and 15,000 employees, the bank battles for market share with the world’s largest money-center banks.

Executives tried to implement lean banking improvements. But their internal operations consulting teams struggled. Cost cutting measures were easy. But increasing knowledge worker productivity was tough. They failed to find ways to improve banking services while achieving cost reduction.

The Lab’s Knowlege Work Standardization best practice future state process maps showed how standardization could do both. The implementation effort began with an 8-week, bank-wide Phase I analysis. This generated a self-funding, Phase II implementation work plan.

Within 6 months, The Lab had standardized the bank into a “knowledge work factory.” Bank-wide operating costs fell 20 percent. Revenue productivity was up 15 percent. And customer service improved on all metrics. 

Project Objectives
  • Cost reduction
  • Lean banking improvement
  • Automation
  • Organization standardization
  • Revenue productivity increase
Project Scope
  • Retail branches (1,000)
  • Front office groups
  • Back office: deposit ops; loan ops
  • Support groups: IT; finance; HR

Banking Process Improvement: Implementation Examples

The Lab implemented more than 400 standardization-based, “process-first” banking improvements. Examples:

Improved Inbound Quality — More than 45 percent of inbound loan and account applications arrived in the back office with significant data errors and omissions. A handful of implemented best practices in banking operations and daily productivity Super KPIs slashed this inbound error rate to 10 percent within one month.

Reduced Duplicated Activities — The retail branches often performed tasks that were duplicated in back-office business processes. The front office created errors that the back office corrected. In eight weeks, The Lab’s process standardization effort transformed these front office tasks into 15 standard work processes residing in a centralized back office that were then automated with robotic process automation.

Reduced Customer Over-service — The bank execs passionately believed that customers appreciated zero wait time in the branches. The Lab demonstrated that customers were indifferent to wait times as long as 90 seconds. Reducing this over-service always delivers a major cost reduction in banking—roughly 20 percent of branch organization capacity.

Schedule a call